Research: Resisting neoliberal education reform in Newark and Camden

September 22, 2019

In their article, “What enables communities to resist neoliberal education reforms? Lessons from Newark and Camden, New Jersey” (Journal of Urban Affairs, April 2019), Bloustein School Associate Professor Julia Sass Rubin and Stephen Danley (Rutgers, Camden) examine the political factors that allow communities to resist undemocratic education governance mechanisms that are used to implement a neoliberal educational agenda.

What enables communities to resist neoliberal education reforms? Lessons from Newark and Camden, New Jersey

Danley and Rubin note that “neoliberal education reformers advance a set of strategies intended to improve public education by incorporating market-based approaches. To facilitate the adoption of these often unpopular ideas, neoliberal reformers advocate for governance mechanisms that make it more challenging for communities to control their public schools. The prevalence of such undemocratic governance mechanisms has grown over the last decade, undercutting communities’ efforts to organize in opposition to the neoliberal education agenda. However, these governance mechanisms do not necessarily shut down the organizing.”

Danley and Rubin argue that it is important to understand what enables sustained community resistance to neoliberal education reform to exist in the presence of such undemocratic governance mechanisms, in order to help build an infrastructure supportive of such organizing. “Even when that infrastructure is present, grassroots organizers often face an uphill climb. Lacking that infrastructure tips the scales overwhelmingly away from communities and toward the neoliberal education reformers.”

They find that “social and economic capital and access to information are critical for creating conditions that enable sustained resistance under undemocratic governance mechanisms.” They “also identify an additional factor that helps explain the different levels of community resistance in Camden and Newark: the role of parochial and oppressive politics that include retaliatory tactics that undermine resistance.”

Recent Posts

NJSPL Report: Analyzing the Use and Equity of ARPA Funds

Report Release: Analyzing the Use and Equity of ARPA Funds in NJ Local Governments and Beyond New Jersey State Policy Lab The American Rescue Plan Act’s Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA-SLFRF) represent a historic $350 billion investment to...

Dr. Grafova Presented Posters from the VSR Research

Dr. Irina Grafova recently returned from the AcademyHealth Research Meeting in Minneapolis, where she had the opportunity to present two posters from the Virtual Schwartz Rounds emotional support program for nurses, run by the New Jersey Nursing Emotional Well-being...

Heldrich Report: Analysis of NJ Life Sciences, Tech Sectors

The Heldrich Center, in conjunction with the New Jersey Economic Development Authority (NJEDA), is pleased to share a new workforce analysis of the life sciences and technology sectors in New Jersey, with a particular emphasis on the sectors’ intersection with...

Restrepo-Mieth Researches Tree Inventories in Galápagos, Ecuador

Who wants a tree inventory and why? The politics of inventorying urban forestry in Galápagos, Ecuador Abstract Trees make significant contributions to the urban experience by providing ecosystem services and aesthetic value. Considering these contributions, cities are...

NJSPL: Georeferencing Historical Maps for Geospatial Analysis

New Jersey State Policy Lab, Jonathan DeLura Our project to create a dataset of historical water bodies in New Jersey began by finding maps of historical water bodies. Two atlases were used to locate historical water bodies in New Jersey. The first was Atlas of the...